{"id":11366,"date":"2011-06-23T11:05:34","date_gmt":"2011-06-23T10:05:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/?p=11366"},"modified":"2019-08-09T11:10:33","modified_gmt":"2019-08-09T10:10:33","slug":"ppi-claim-in-an-iva","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/ppi-claim-in-an-iva\/","title":{"rendered":"PPI claim in an IVA"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A lot of effective compensation claims have been made and continue to be  made against lenders with regards to Payment Protection Insurance  (PPI). Any person who considers that they may have been miss-sold a PPI  policy is eligible to claim against the lender and a large number of  such borrowers already have garnered damages from the offending  creditors.<br>In the context of an individual entering into an Individual  Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) where one or more loan companies offered  PPI previously, the consumer could make a claim for the purpose of  compensation against any financial institution who miss-sold this type  of protection plan. The fact that payment of the Payment protection  insurance premiums may have contributed to the borrower\u2019s failure to pay  off their debts and obligated the person in debt to go into an IVA is  not applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Should the customer have a PPI compensation claim\n in place ahead of getting into an IVA, any compensation paid whilst the\n IVA is up and running will be dealt with as a windfall and any money \nacquired through the period of time of the IVA will need to be handed \nover into the IVA for the gain of creditors. The conditions and terms of\n the Individual voluntary arrangement offer may possibly enable the \ncreditor who is stumping up the settlement, to counterbalance the \ndamages against any unsecured debt due to that lender and any surplus of\n the damages which remains has to be given into the Individual voluntary\n arrangement for the advantage of the other lenders. The contribution of\n some or all of this kind of windfall to the debtor\u2019s Individual \nvoluntary arrangement doesn&#8217;t signify that the person in debt may avoid \nmaking the specified recurring contributions during the complete time \nperiod of the Individual voluntary arrangement just as initially agreed \nupon. Nor can the debtor limit the total of any other one time payment \ninto the Individual voluntary arrangement which had been offered and \nagreed in the beginning, for instance equity in property. The \ncompensation monies just enhance the total of the liability that \ncreditors will have repaid to them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"291\" height=\"413\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Fotolia_47267166_XS.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-11375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Fotolia_47267166_XS.jpg 291w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Fotolia_47267166_XS-211x300.jpg 211w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 291px) 100vw, 291px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>In cases where the consumer \nmakes the demand for Ppi damages when the Individual voluntary \narrangement has begun, any damages shelled out will be handled as a \nwindfall in the likewise manner. It&#8217;s completely the debtor\u2019s option \nwhether to make any such insurance claim throughout the life of the \nIndividual voluntary arrangement. Indeed the consumer is by law \npermitted to defer making a Payment protection insurance claim until the\n Individual voluntary arrangement ends and to then retain any award \nmade, without being required to repay any creditors, since all financial\n obligations will certainly have been cancelled by that stage. However, \nthe person in debt must think about the risk that the right to make a \nPpi damages claim could lapse, simply because of the Statute of \nLimitations. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the situation of the consumer going into into an\n Individual voluntary arrangement, the management of Payment protection \ninsurance compensation claims, based on miss-selling of the policies, \nbrings about significant discussion, whether or not all financial \ninstitutions are handled equally and fairly when the funds from a \nsuccessful claim are distributed. To permit the \u2018miss-selling\u2019 financial\n institution to counterbalance the compensation against the liability \nprior to managing the available balance as a windfall for the benefit of\n all creditors appears to be the general process and the least unfair \ncourse of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A further consideration is that the supervisor \nof the Individual voluntary arrangement stands to gain by encouraging \nthe borrower to pursue the Payment protection insurance compensation \nclaim, where the supervisor\u2019s fees rely on realisations from the \nIndividual voluntary arrangement. The greater the realisations, the \nhigher the amount the supervisor may charge, when the supervisor\u2019s \ncontracted fee is founded on a portion of realisations. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The call\n to go ahead with the Ppi compensation claim resides totally with the \nconsumer and it would not be shocking if a debtor in this situation \nopposed any encouragement or duress by the supervisor or indeed by \nlenders (to pursue the claim) until the IVA had run its course, in the \nhope of being allowed to keep the total total of damages paid, when \ncreditors would have suffered the loss of all rights to a share in the \nproceeds. Whatever about the ethics of any judgement to hold off making a\n Ppi claim, the borrower is legally entitled to defer the matter until \nthe IVA has been completed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, a number of individuals in \nIVAs may truly feel that they prefer to maximize the level of their debt\n that they&#8217;re going to pay back to creditors and for that reason may \nwant to carry out their Payment protection insurance compensation claim \nforthwith and chip in any cash thus attained to their IVAs. There is one\n other advantage which derives from doing this: should they encounter \ntrouble in making their regular contributions to their Individual \nvoluntary arrangement, owing to loss of employment, ill health or other \ncauses, lenders could possibly consider their Payment protection \ninsurance compensation lump sum payment to the Individual voluntary \narrangement in a advantageous light and consider the terms of the IVA to\n have been attained, especially where the originally promised dividend \nin the IVA has been achieved or exceeded. In such circumstances, lenders\n may agree to a lowering of the amount of the monthly payments to the \nIVA or perhaps a decrease in the time period of the Individual voluntary\n arrangement. On the other hand, should the consumer willfully delays \nmaking the Ppi claim, intending to defer that move until the Individual \nvoluntary arrangement has been successfully completed, and if creditors \nare aware of the matter, then they could possibly take a less lax \nanalysis of the debtor\u2019s failing to stick to the terms of the original \nIVA proposal and fail the IVA, knowing that they could chase the debtor \nfor payment of any outstanding money owed down the road, when the Ppi \nclaim will have been pursued.\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Should you have a PPI compensation claim  in place ahead of getting into an IVA, any compensation paid whilst the  IVA is up and running will be dealt with as a windfall.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iva-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11366"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11376,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11366\/revisions\/11376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}