{"id":12779,"date":"2010-11-25T08:47:40","date_gmt":"2010-11-25T08:47:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/?p=12779"},"modified":"2020-02-18T09:05:03","modified_gmt":"2020-02-18T09:05:03","slug":"buy-to-let-in-an-iva","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/buy-to-let-in-an-iva\/","title":{"rendered":"Buy to let in an IVA"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Many people bought property before and during the boom expecting that  by increasing equity over a period of years they would get a better  return than they would otherwise. The plan was to buy a property at a  reasonable price, let it out for a few years, sell it on and pocket the  profits. Hence the boom extended to what became known as the \u2018Buy to  Let\u2019 sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>The idea was simplicity itself. An individual or a couple  with a reasonable disposable income purchase a property and let it out  to tenants. Mortgages of up to 100% were easy to come by and rents were  buoyant. In principle and generally in practice the rental income more  than covered the monthly mortgage payments. The property increased in  value year on year and in due course the sale of the property would  yield a nice little profit, even allowing for capital gains tax. For  many the temptation was repeated and rather than limit their ambitions  to one or two properties, they bought multiple properties, sometimes  hundreds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"Property Owner in an IVA\" class=\"wp-image-12797\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/937-2048x1365.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>And then the bubble burst. The continuous increase in property values  slowed down and eventually began to go the other way as property sales  volumes and prices tumbled. The demand for rental properties began to  reduce and rental income began to fall. Suddenly those who entered the  \u2018Buy to Let\u2019 sector found that they were unable to reverse the process  easily. As demand for property fell so did prices. And so did rental  incomes. The mortgage payments on some properties began to exceed the  rental income. Letting sometimes became impossible. The term negative  equity re-entered the vocabulary \u2013 in truth, it had never gone away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because selling properties at a loss was an unattractive option, \npeople held on to their \u2018Buy to Let\u2019 properties for too long. Instead of\n the hoped for recovery in the housing market, things got worse. As a \nresult many such investors found that they were insolvent. Their \ndisposable income was insufficient to bridge the gap between their \n(multiple) mortgage payments and their rental income. Mortgage payments \nfell into arrears and they began to seek solutions for their financial \ndifficulties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given that selling the properties would lead to shortfalls, many \ndebtors opted to enter Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs) rather \nthan petition for their own Bankruptcy (BCY). &nbsp;They found that a crucial\n factor to be considered would be the attitude of their creditors to an \nIVA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Buy to Let in an IVA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In proposing an IVA, the \u2018Buy to Let\u2019 property has to be considered \nfrom two perspectives \u2013 the net cost to the debtor of retaining the \nproperty and the equity therein. If the debtor has several or indeed \nmany such properties, then each property usually has to be considered \nseparately and on its own merits, so to speak.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If a property is <em>\u2018cost neutral\u2019<\/em>\n i.e. the rental income is wholly consumed by the mortgage payments \n(plus any other valid associated costs such as insurance or maintenance)\n with no significant surplus or deficit arising then creditors will only\n be interested in whether there is any equity available in and \nrecoverable from the property. Unsecured creditors have nothing to gain \nfrom forcing the debtor to sell a property which is in negative equity \nsince any shortfall arising would then be introduced into the IVA and \nwould have the effect of reducing the dividend for all creditors. If on \nthe other hand the property has a significant amount of positive equity \nthen creditors will expect all such equity or a high percentage of it to\n be introduced into the IVA. Thus the property in question may have to \nbe sold or the equity addressed by some other means such as the \ncontribution of third party funds or remortgage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the property is <em>\u2018cost positive\u2019<\/em>\n and generates significant net income i.e. the rental income exceeds the\n mortgage payments (plus any other valid associated costs such as \ninsurance or maintenance), then creditors will expect any such surplus \nincome to be contributed to the IVA over the full term of the IVA. If \nthe property is in negative equity, it is not in the interests of \ncreditors that it be sold. If there is significant equity in the \nproperty then creditors will expect all or a high percentage of such \nequity to be realized by sale or remortgage before the end of the term \nof the IVA, usually in the fourth or fifth year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally if the property is <em>\u2018cost negative\u2019<\/em>\n i.e. the rental income is significantly lower than the mortgage \npayments (plus any other valid associated costs such as insurance or \nmaintenance), then creditors might require the debtor to sell the \nproperty. Following such a sale, the savings made from eliminating the <em>\u2018cost negative\u2019<\/em>\n factor would allow monthly contributions to the IVA to be increased. If\n the property was in positive equity, any equity realized would be \ncontributed to the IVA. Obviously, if the property was in substantial \nnegative equity, the shortfall following its sale would be claimed as an\n unsecured debt of the arrangement. This could depress the dividend to \nsuch an extent that it would be in the interests of the unsecured \ncreditors to allow the debtor to retain the property, not withstanding \nthe fact that its retention would be <em>\u2018cost negative\u2019<\/em>.\n However, once the property is no longer in negative equity, creditors \nmight require that it be sold and the savings introduced into the IVA.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many people bought property before and during the boom expecting that by increasing equity over a period of years they would get a better return than they would otherwise. The plan was to buy a property at a reasonable price, let it out for a few years, sell it on and pocket the profits. Hence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iva-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12779"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12798,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12779\/revisions\/12798"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}