{"id":1934,"date":"2014-01-02T11:33:41","date_gmt":"2014-01-02T11:33:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/?p=1934"},"modified":"2019-02-28T12:12:25","modified_gmt":"2019-02-28T12:12:25","slug":"iva-4th-year-valuation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/iva-4th-year-valuation\/","title":{"rendered":"IVA &#8211; 4th year Valuation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>It has long been standard practice for creditors to require some part of <strong>equity<\/strong> in property to be released and contributed by debtors who own such <strong>property<\/strong> and who enter into<strong> Individual Voluntary Arrangements<\/strong> (<strong>IVAs<\/strong>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>The debtor may already have anticipated this requirement and addressed any equity in their property in the IVA proposal. One of the benefits of an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-help\/iva.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\" (opens in a new tab)\">Individual Voluntary Arrangement<\/a> is that the debtor does not usually lose their home which they will almost certainly do in Bankruptcy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When a property owning debtor has not addressed such equity in their  IVA proposal, the usual approach taken by creditors is to modify the IVA  proposal requiring them to do so. The modification generally spells out  how this is to be done and how much of the equity is to be contributed.  Such a modification usually requires the supervisor to obtain at least  one independent valuation (and often two valuations) of the debtor\u2019s  property in the fourth or fifth year of the IVA. The debtor is further  required to obtain at least one offer of re-mortgage and to contribute  at least 75% (and sometimes up to 100%) of their equity to the IVA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_770086_M-1024x667.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1947\" width=\"313\" height=\"203\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_770086_M-1024x667.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_770086_M-300x195.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_770086_M-768x500.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_770086_M.jpg 1708w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 313px) 100vw, 313px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Every IVA is different from every other one and there can be \nsignificant variation in how different creditors require equity to be \naddressed. A number of issues may arise when the time comes for the \n\u2018fourth year modification\u2019 \u2013 as it is frequently described \u2013 to be \nimplemented. The property may be in negative or zero equity. The equity \nmay be so small that that the cost of realization wipes it out. Even if \nthere is some equity in the property, the debtor may find it impossible \nto obtain a re-mortgage for various reasons \u2013 the credit crunch, a poor \ncredit rating or lenders putting a cap on the loan to value (LTV) ratio \nfor example. In addition, even when there is equity available in theory,\n it may be impossible to realize it in practice. It may also be that \n\u2018high street\u2019 lenders will not offer a re-mortgage at all and only \n\u2018sub-prime\u2019 lenders are willing to do so \u2013 but only at adverse interest \nrates, with the consequent long term effect on the borrower\u2019s finances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What can the debtor do, given that failure to contribute an equity \nlump sum would depress the dividend payable to creditors significantly? \nThe usual solution is for the debtor to offer a variation proposal to \ncreditors. Such a variation can simply request the removal of the \n\u2018equity\u2019 modification, allowing the debtor to successfully complete the \nIVA without making any equity contribution. If creditors were to accept \nsuch a variation, they would receive a dividend similar to that \noriginally proposed but less than that required by the creditor \nmodification. Alternatively, the debtor may offer a variation proposal \noffering to extend the term of the proposal for up to one additional \nyear and to make additional monthly income based contributions in lieu \nof any equity in the property. While extending the arrangement by up to \none year may not be attractive for the debtor or indeed for the \ncreditors, it is certainly preferable to re-mortgaging at adverse rates,\n which is likely to have long term negative financial consequences for \nthe debtor. Creditors of course retain the right to reject or modify any\n variation proposals put forward by the debtor but extending the term to\n address equity is frequently acceptable to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The insolvency practitioner (IP) supervising the IVA will advise the \ndebtor on the options regarding addressing equity and creditors are \ngenerally sympathetic to debtors who are genuinely attempting to address\n their financial affairs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It has long been standard practice for creditors to require some part of equity in property to be released and contributed by debtors who own such property and who enter into Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iva-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1934"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1934\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3185,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1934\/revisions\/3185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}