{"id":2047,"date":"2014-01-02T12:04:15","date_gmt":"2014-01-02T12:04:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/?p=2047"},"modified":"2019-02-13T12:04:50","modified_gmt":"2019-02-13T12:04:50","slug":"iva-proposal-rejected-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/iva-proposal-rejected-2\/","title":{"rendered":"IVA proposal rejected &#8211; 2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This is the second of two articles which look at the attitude of  creditors towards an IVA proposal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>In the first article we looked at  some aspects of how HM Revenue &amp; Customs (HMRC) view an IVA proposal  particularly in relation to non-compliance and preferential treatment  of creditors. We also looked at the thorny problem of a debtor proposing  an IVA having incurred recent debts and particularly when the credit is  obtained from a new or relatively new creditor. Finally  we looked at why creditors sometimes prefer a debtor to enter a Debt  Management Plan rather than an IVA particularly if debts could be repaid  in full in a Debt Management Plan in ten years or less. Here are some  further scenarios where a creditor might reject an IVA which on the face  of it might appear to be an excellent proposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_35725201_XS.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2061\" width=\"326\" height=\"218\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_35725201_XS.jpg 424w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Fotolia_35725201_XS-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 326px) 100vw, 326px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The first scenario where a creditor might reject an IVA goes back to  the expectation of creditors that the debtor be open, frank and honest  in disclosing all relevant matters for inclusion in the IVA proposal.  Take a situation where a creditor is aware of a significant matter  relating to the debtor\u2019s prior financial history and relevant to the  debtor\u2019s current financial difficulties and the matter is not disclosed  in the IVA proposal. Assuming that the creditor\u2019s awareness of such a  matter is entirely legitimate based on prior business or personal  dealings with the debtor, the Data Protection Act would not protect the  debtor from the creditor disclosing the matter to the nominee. In any  case, it is hardly surprising that the creditor would reject the IVA  proposal in this scenario, without giving any reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A further scenario is where the estimated dividend is so low that it \nis not financially viable for the creditor to approve the IVA. Suppose \nfor example that the debt was \u00a3500 and the projected dividend in a five \nyears IVA is 20p in the \u00a3. The creditor can expect to receive \u00a3100 of \nthe debt to be repaid over five years. The administrative costs of \nproviding a proof of debt and keeping the account open might not be \nworthwhile financially.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A third scenario is where the creditor has taken steps to secure the \ndebt by obtaining a charging order against the debtor\u2019s property. \nSuppose that a creditor has already obtained an interim charging order \nwhen the debtor\u2019s IVA proposal arrives. The creditor has two choices. \nThe first choice is to proceed to obtain a final charging order and rely\n on that for the satisfaction of the debt hoping that the IVA will be \nrejected so that the charging order can be made absolute. If relying on \nthe charging order the creditor would not be permitted to vote for or \nagainst the IVA and if the IVA was approved the charging order would not\n be granted and the creditor could claim as an unsecured creditor in the\n IVA, receiving the same dividend as the other unsecured creditors. The \nsecond choice available is for the creditor to give up their security \nand submit an unsecured debt claim in the IVA and thus be permitted to \nvote for or against the proposal. If the IVA proposal was rejected, the \ncreditor could re-apply for a charging order after the meeting of \ncreditors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The last scenario is where the lifestyle of the debtor leads a \ncreditor to conclude that an IVA would be likely to fail in supervision.\n Creditors look at how debts were accrued in the first place. If the \ndebtor engaged in a lavish but unsustainable life style over a period of\n time apparently not caring whether such lifestyle debts could be repaid\n or worse, borrowing recklessly knowing that the debts could not be \nrepaid in any reasonable time frame, then creditors would be inclined to\n reject such a proposal. If the debtor\u2019s lifestyle involved chronic \naddictive behaviour such as excessive gambling, drinking or taking drugs\n and if the insolvency was due to such behaviour, creditors would have \nto be satisfied that such behaviour had ceased and that the debtor had \ntaken reliable corrective action to sustain the changed behaviour, \nbefore accepting such an IVA.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is the second of two articles which look at the attitude of creditors towards an IVA proposal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iva-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2047"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2062,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2047\/revisions\/2062"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}