{"id":4132,"date":"2014-02-28T13:07:51","date_gmt":"2014-02-28T13:07:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/?p=4132"},"modified":"2019-05-03T13:09:55","modified_gmt":"2019-05-03T12:09:55","slug":"insolvency-in-ireland","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/insolvency-in-ireland\/","title":{"rendered":"Insolvency in Ireland"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Back in 2009 we looked at what the prospects were at that time for  new legislation which would address the then burgeoning problems of <strong>personal debt<\/strong> and for many people the looming threat of <strong>personal insolvency<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps  now is as good a time as any, to compare what was being proposed then  with what we now have and see how many of the original boxes were  ticked. In 2009 the <strong>Law Reform Commission of Ireland<\/strong> or <strong>LRCI<\/strong>  published what we then described as a remarkable consultation paper on  personal debt which made many recommendations for urgent changes to  insolvency law in Ireland to bring it into line with most other EU  countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Fotolia_34920925_M-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"Irish Insolvency\" class=\"wp-image-4145\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Fotolia_34920925_M-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Fotolia_34920925_M-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Fotolia_34920925_M-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Fotolia_34920925_M.jpg 1688w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>At the time the European Commission was also putting pressure on the \nIrish Government to deal with the issue. The LRCI paper looked closely \nat the key issue of ability to pay and recommended that the treatment of\n those who can\u2019t pay should be in stark contrast to the treatment of \nthose who can pay but won\u2019t. At the time the EC stated that those who \ncan\u2019t pay personal debts should not go to prison but such legal \nsanctions should be retained for those who can pay but were refusing to \ndo so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let us assign marks out of ten for the actions taken by government \nsince 2009 versus the LRCI recommendations of 2009. The key \nrecommendations were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>That the Bankruptcy Act 1988 should be significantly amended to  provide an adequate and effective system. The LRCI stated at that time  that making detailed recommendations for a new bankruptcy law was beyond  the scope of the consultation paper. <em>Marks out of ten: three.&nbsp;  Though the law has been amended significantly, it does not seem to be  either adequate or effective. In particular the three years discharge  period makes it unattractive when compared to the UK bankruptcy regime  where discharge within one year is the norm and bankruptcy tourism from  Ireland to the UK is flourishing.<\/em><\/li><li>New Irish Laws should be enacted to provide for a non-judicial Debt  Settlement System, which would be favoured over court-based personal  insolvency proceedings. Such a Debt Settlement Scheme would be binding  in law on all creditors, if accepted by a majority of creditors. <em>Marks  out of ten: three again. The government seems to have erred badly in  implementing a system of \u2018Protective Notices\u2019 or PCs similar to the old  and now disbanded UK system of \u2018Interim Orders\u2019. PCs can only be  obtained from a court and six judges were newly appointed to run the  system, which seems to be turning out to be little more than a  \u2018rubber-stamping\u2019 exercise. Bureaucratic, inefficient and costly for the  debtor and creditors and worst of all a time consuming and delaying  mechanism with few if any discernible benefits.<\/em><\/li><li>Only insolvent debtors would be permitted to participate in the  scheme. Insolvency would be defined as inability to meet debts as they  fall due and this condition would have to be likely to continue over a  significant period of time i.e. not a \u2018snapshot\u2019 condition. <em>Marks out  of ten: eight. All of the new insolvency solutions seem to have this  conditionality clearly stated. There is a problem however in that there  are probably significant numbers of insolvent debtors for whom none of  the new insolvency solutions are suitable, affordable or both. If only  reliable statistics were available from ISI or elsewhere to measure this  issue.<\/em><\/li><li><em> <\/em>Insolvent debtors should not be excluded from the scheme due to excessive costs. <em>Marks  out of ten: four. Surely it is unacceptable that insolvent persons must  fork out large amounts of money which they don\u2019t have to PIPs or to the  ISI before they can even begin to access one of the new insolvency  solutions. It is true that many PIPs do not charge upfront fees and the  statutory costs of bankruptcy have been reduced in Ireland but surely it  would have given a badly-needed stimulus to the new insolvency system  to delay charging statutory fees until creditors have accepted the  debtor\u2019s proposal.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/em><\/li><li>The scheme would not exclude those with no income and no assets and  it should be possible for a debtor making \u2018zero payments\u2019 to be  accommodated. <em>Marks out of ten: eight. The new Debt Relief Notice or  DRN which is available for insolvent debtors with debts of less than  \u20ac20,000, few assets and low disposable income meets this criterion but  why the term of a DRN had to be set at three years rather than say one  year, as it is in the UK, is baffling.<\/em><\/li><li>Repayment plans under the scheme should allow debtors to retain  sufficient income to provide a reasonable standard of living for  themselves and their families. <em>Marks out of ten: nine. The new  solutions certainly allow for debtors availing of them to continue to  enjoy a reasonable standard of living but it remains to be seen how  creditors will react when debtors claim genuine living expenses out of  the norm for certain exceptional living costs.<\/em><\/li><li>The repayment timeframe should be between three and five years after which the debtor would be \u2018debt-free\u2019. <em>Marks  out of ten: four. The term of a DRN is three years, the term of a Debt  Settlement Arrangement or DSA is five to six years and the term of a  Personal Insolvency Arrangement or PIA is six to seven years. Once again  the duration of each solution appears to be punitive as far as the  debtor is concerned and appears to have been weighted in the interests  of creditors. As for bankruptcy the glaring discrepancy in the duration  before discharge between the Irish system and the UK system speaks  volumes.<\/em><\/li><\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Changes to insolvency law in Ireland to bring it into line with most other EU countries.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-debt-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4132"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4156,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4132\/revisions\/4156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldebtrelief.co.uk\/debt-articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}